 |
DATA |
|
| |
| The goal of the Comparative Constitutions Project is to collect data on the formal characteristics of written constitutions, both current and historical, for most independent states since 1789. Characteristics include aspects of both form and content of these documents.To achieve this goal, we have divided the research into three concurrent phases. |
| |
 |
Phase I |
|
| |
|
The first phase is to construct constitutional chronologies for all independent states in our sample. Reconstructing constitutional chronologies for all independent states is not a simple matter and we rely upon a collection of cross-national, regional, and country-level sources in order to compile the data. The magisterial Constitutions of the Countries of the World (Flanz and Blaustein 1971-present) provides invaluable background information for most countries. Other useful cross-national and regional sources include Maddex (2001), Fitzgibbon (1948), Peaslee (1950-1971), and the Political Database of the Americas at Georgetown. Of course, country-level studies are at the root of these multi-country sources and we use these more specific studies when possible (available). While we are confident that we have identified nearly all new constitutions ever written using these sources, it is quite possible that we have overlooked a fair number of amendments, especially older ones, simply because they are less well-documented. Although we are constantly adding new constitutional events as they occur, we have nearly completed this phase in terms of the historical events, with more than 2000 constitutional events occurring between 1789 and the present. To read more about the decisions made when creating the constitutional chronologies, please click the links below. Conceptualizing Constitutions
Unit of Analysis
Sample |
| |
 |
PHASE II |
|
| |
The second phase of our project entails acquiring English texts for every constitutional event. Thanks to the monumental efforts of several previous comparative constitutional scholars and resources at the University of Illinois library, reliable English translations of historical constitutions are available for almost all of our cases. Of the 2,224 constitutional events in our sample, we have acquired what appear to be reliable English translations of 1,162. Actually, we have identified texts for all 594 new events, but 191 of these texts are in the native language (134 of these are in Spanish and 31 are in French). We are currently investigating the possibility of getting these foreign language texts translated. Most of the texts which we have not found are amendments. Of the 1,412 amendments identified, we have only found 571 reliable English language texts (~40%), leaving 841 “amendments” left to find. However, we are hopeful that we will locate all the remaining 1062 texts, either in their original language or translated into English. While we will no doubt encounter several gaps and issues of translation, we are reassured by our thorough search for these texts that source material will not be a problem for our study. See the links below for more details about our efforts to acquire constitutional texts.
Sources of Constitutional Texts
Translation Issues |
| |
 |
PHASE III |
|
| |
The third phase of the project is to code each constitutional event. This phase is the core of the Comparative Constitutions Project. Although the research from phases I and II is useful in its own right, the main reason for these two phases is to facilitate the coding in phase III. Please click on the links below to learn more about phase III.
Survey Instrument
Coding Procedures
Interpretation Issues
Survey Software |
| |
 |
AVAILABLE DATA |
|
| |
The CCP now has data from all phases of the project available for download:
Download Available Data
You will be asked to complete a very short registration form if this is your first time accessing the data.
Additional data may be available, in incomplete form, for use by researchers associated with the project or those involved in constitutional drafting. Please contact the investigators if you have such a request.
If you would like to be notified of future data releases by the Comparative Constitutions Project, please click here to subscribe to our mailing list.
|
| |
 |
ERRORS AND OMISSIONS |
|
| |
Although we have done our best to ensure that all data released by the CCP are reliable, data from a project of this magnitude will inevitably suffer from some errors and omissions.
Moreover, constitutions, often lend themselves to various interpretations. We kindly ask users of these data to help improve the data's reliability by reporting such mistakes and/or differences
of interpretation that they encounter to us via the link below. This will ensure the data contained in future releases are as reliable as possible.
Report an Error or Omission - UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
Our error reporting system is currently under development. Until this section of the website is complete, please report errors and omissions via e-mail (ccperrors@gmail.com). Thank you for your understanding. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|